The Myths Associated with Pines
Do pines damage soils?
One of the most common myths associated with growing pines is that they greatly acidify
soils. Research undertaken by Forests NSW during a 20-year period has shown this
is not so. In fact, in some instances it can be demonstrated that pine trees have less of
an acidifying effect on soils than either eucalypts or improved pasture.
Pine plantations do not significantly deplete soil nutrient reserves, even after
several rotations (crops), because pine trees are deep feeders and they recycle nutrients
after the tree crowns interlock (crown closure) at about age eight. However, changes in
the nature of surface soil organic matter is still likely with pines because of the high
carbon-to-nitrogen ratio found in the needle litter under pine plantations.
By comparison, agricultural practices such as pasture improvement, greatly modify soil
properties. Soil organic matter and nutrient levels increase through the application of
fertiliser. In particular, the level of available phosphorus increases as a result of
regular applications of super phosphate.
In some circumstances, long-term pasture improvement with legumes produces a
substantial increase in nitrogen levels and an increase in the acidity of the soil,
through the accumulation and rapid turnover of organic matter and high rates of nitrogen
mineralisation and nitrate production.
These processes also promote leaching of exchangeable cations and therefore reduce the
fertility of the surface soil. Generally, soluble aluminium and manganese quantities also
increase as a consequence of regular pasture fertilisation and may even reach levels
harmful to plant growth.
By comparison, the effect of pine trees on the soil is relatively uncomplicated. Pine
trees go through two distinct phases in their nutrient use development:
- The establishment phase (0 to 8 years), when crowns rapidly expand and trees
accumulate nutrients at rates comparable with pastures.
- The closed canopy phase (8 to 30 years), when tree crowns interlock and stabilise,
and nutrient cycling commences.
In the long term, this results in radiata pine plantations accumulating less nutrients
than agricultural crops. Nutrient cycling under radiata pine may also slowly reverse the
trend in nitrogen mineralisation and nitrate production caused by pasture improvement, and
even reverse soil acidification.
The location of nutrients within a pine tree is also an important factor to consider.
In pines the component which is harvested (the trunk) typically constitutes around 70 per
cent of the above-ground biomass, yet it contains only a small proportion of the
nutrients. On the other hand, the crown and litter components of pine trees, which are not
usually removed from the site, contain between 50 and 70 per cent of the total nutrients
in the biomass. By contrast, the bulk of nutrients in pastures and crops is removed when
they are grazed or harvested.
While some changes in soil nutrient status will occur under pines, the soils will
remain suitable for alternative forms of land use, such as pasture, after the trees are
harvested. This point has been demonstrated at Mannus Correctional Centre where 325
hectares (825 acres) of land formerly under mature pine plantation have been returned to
highly productive pasture.
Are pine forests biological deserts?
While it is true that radiata pine forests, like most other agricultural crops, are
monocultures (single species), many species of wildlife have adapted readily to living in
or adjacent to pine forests.
Surveys in State forests' Tumut Management Area have shown that of the 214 species of
birds recorded in State forests, 110 are sighted in pine plantations and nine of the 31
native mammals recorded are also found in pine plantations.
In State forests' Bathurst Management Area, about 50 per cent of all bird species
recorded in State forests were within or closely associated with pine plantations; 12
species of birds in the area have been observed nesting within plantations.
Animal life in plantations is often highly visible but lacks diversity. In particular,
those animals that are dependent on the foliage of native vegetation for food or hollow
branch stubs for nesting or roosting are usually in low numbers.
The number of animals and diversity of animal species present in pine plantations is
influenced by the proximity of native forest and water, both of which are usually found in
filter strips or other retention areas within or adjacent to pine plantations.
There are some animal species which have adapted particularly well to living in pine
plantations, including the larger mammals such as the eastern grey kangaroo, red-necked
wallaby, swamp wallaby, common wombat and echidna.
Further reading
Soils references
Anon, (1978). Pine planting in NSW, 3rd edition, Forestry Commission of NSW,
Sydney.
DCFL (1988). Research & Development, the effects of radiata pine on soil. Pamphlet No. 9, Research & Development Section, Forest Management and Research Branch,
Victorian Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Cotham Road, Kew, Melbourne.
Horne, R. (1986). The philosophy and practice of P. radiata plantation silviculture
in New South Wales. Technical Paper No. 34, Forestry Commission of NSW, Sydney.
Laclaren, J.P. (1993). Radiata Pine Growers' Manual, FRI Bulletin No. 184, New
Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua.
Wildlife references
Anon (1984). Management Plan for Tumut Management Area. Forestry Commission of
NSW, Sydney.
Anon (1987). Management Plan for Bathurst Management Area. Forestry Commission
of NSW, Sydney.
Friend, G.R. (1980). Wildlife conservation and softwood forestry in Australia: some
considerations. Australian Forestry 43 (4), 217-224.
Friend, G.R. (1982). Mammal populations in exotic pine plantations and indigenous
eucalypt forests in Gippsland, Victoria. Australian Forestry 45 (1), 3-18.
|